twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #526 |
I want to invite you to join me and my Republican colleagues online today starting at 1:00 p.m. EST in a special 12 hour webcast where we'll expose the truth about Speaker Pelosi's disastrous government takeover of health care and promote the GOP alternative that is focused on lowering costs. I know you're as opposed to Speaker Pelosi's bill as I am. That's why I hope you'll spread the word to your friends and family about this unique, interactive event hosted by the RNC.
You'll be able to ask questions through email, Twitter, or Facebook, and interact with Republican lawmakers and RNC Chairman Steele as we spend the day examining "12 truths" about this reckless proposal, which will: - Radically increase government spending and raise taxes on families and small businesses;
- Destroy millions of jobs; and
- Make health care more expensive for all Americans.
On the other hand, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says the Republican alternative will actually lower premiums for Americans by up to 10 percent and reduce the deficit by $68 billion – without raising taxes.
Using CBO analysis, experts on the House Ways & Means Committee calculated that, under the Republican bill, premiums for millions of families will be nearly $5,000 cheaper than under the least expensive Democratic plan.
It's clear that the Speaker's bill is a bad deal for the country -- but we need your help to spread the word. So if you have time, please join us today during our 12 hour "Pelosi Plan Exposed" webcast!

John Boehner House Republican Leader
P.S., With the Speaker rushing her enormous bill to a vote as soon as this weekend, this interactive online webcast is designed to educate Americans about its cost and consequences. Click here to watch starting at 1:00 p.m. EST or hop on at any point all day!
|
| Loading... | | |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #527 |
I want to invite you to join me and my Republican colleagues online today starting at 1:00 p.m. EST in a special 12 hour webcast where we'll expose the truth about Speaker Pelosi's disastrous government takeover of health care and promote the GOP alternative that is focused on lowering costs. I know you're as opposed to Speaker Pelosi's bill as I am. That's why I hope you'll spread the word to your friends and family about this unique, interactive event hosted by the RNC.
You'll be able to ask questions through email, Twitter, or Facebook, and interact with Republican lawmakers and RNC Chairman Steele as we spend the day examining "12 truths" about this reckless proposal, which will: - Radically increase government spending and raise taxes on families and small businesses;
- Destroy millions of jobs; and
- Make health care more expensive for all Americans.
On the other hand, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says the Republican alternative will actually lower premiums for Americans by up to 10 percent and reduce the deficit by $68 billion – without raising taxes.
Using CBO analysis, experts on the House Ways & Means Committee calculated that, under the Republican bill, premiums for millions of families will be nearly $5,000 cheaper than under the least expensive Democratic plan.
It's clear that the Speaker's bill is a bad deal for the country -- but we need your help to spread the word. So if you have time, please join us today during our 12 hour "Pelosi Plan Exposed" webcast!

John Boehner House Republican Leader
P.S., With the Speaker rushing her enormous bill to a vote as soon as this weekend, this interactive online webcast is designed to educate Americans about its cost and consequences. Click here to watch starting at 1:00 p.m. EST or hop on at any point all day!
|
| Loading... | | |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #528 |
Pay close attention to this one folks and then send it to your friends!
Cap & Tax!
Thinking about selling your house? Take a look at H.R. 2454 (Cap and Trade Bill)
Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Cap and Trade Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act.
H.R. 2454, the "Cap & Trade" bill passed by the House of Representatives, if also passed by the Senate, will be the largest tax increase any of us has ever experienced. The Congressional Budget Office (supposedly non-partisan) estimates that in just a few years the average cost to every family of four will be $6,800 per year. No one is excluded.
However, once the lower classes feel the pinch in their wallets, you can be sure these voters get a tax refund (even if they pay no taxes at all) to offset this new cost. Thus, you Mr. and Mrs. Middle Class America will have to pay even more since additional tax dollars will be needed to bail out everyone else.
But wait. This awful bill (that no one in Congress has actually read) has many more surprises in it.
Probably the worst one is this: A year from now you won't be able to sell your house.
Yes, you read that right. The caveat is (there always is a caveat) that if you have enough money to make required major upgrades to your home, then you can sell it. But, if not, then forget it. Even pre-fabricated homes ("mobile homes") are included.
In effect, this bill prevents you from selling your home without the permission of the EPA administrator.
To get this permission, you will have to have the energy efficiency of your home measured. Then the government will tell you what your new energy efficiency requirement is and you will be forced to make modifications to your home under the retrofit provisions of this Act to comply with the new energy and water efficiency requirements. Then you will have to get your home measured again and get a license (called a "label" in the Act) that must be posted on your property to show what your efficiency rating is; sort of like the Energy Star efficiency rating label on your refrigerator or air conditioner. If you don't get a high enough rating, you can't sell. And, the EPA administrator is authorized to raise the standards every year, even above the automatic energy efficiency increases built into the Act.
The EPA administrator, appointed by the President, will run the Cap & Trade program (AKA the "American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009") and is authorized to make any future changes to the regulations and standards he alone determines to be in the government's best interest. Requirements are set low initially so the bill will pass Congress; then the Administrator can set much tougher new standards every year.
The Act itself contains annual required increases in energy efficiency for private and commercial residences and buildings. However, the EPA administrator can set higher standards at any time.
Sect. 202 Building Retrofit Program mandates a national retrofit program to increase the energy efficiency of all existing homes across America . Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act. You had better sell soon, because the standards will be raised each year and will be really hard (i.e., ex$pen$ive) to meet in a few years.
Oh, goody! The Act allows the government to give you a grant of several thousand dollars to comply with the retrofit program requirements if you meet certain energy efficiency levels. But, wait, the State can set additional requirements on who qualifies to receive the grants. You should expect requirements such as "can't have an income of more than $50K per year", "home selling price can't be more than $125K", or anything else to target the upper middle class (and that's YOU) and prevent them from qualifying for the grants.
Most of us won't get a dime and will have to pay the entire cost of the retrofit out of our own pockets.. More transfer of wealth, more "change you can believe in."
Sect. 204 Building Energy Performance Labeling Program establishes a labeling program that for each individual residence will identify the achieved energy efficiency performance for "at least 90 percent of the residential market within 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act." This means that within 5 years 90% of all residential homes in the U.S. must be measured and labeled.
The EPA administrator will get $50M each year to enforce the labeling program. The Secretary of the Department of Energy will get an additional $20M each year to help enforce the labeling program. Some of this money will, of course, be spent on coming up with tougher standards each year.
Oh, the label will be like a license for your car. You will be required to post the label in a conspicuous location in your home and will not be allowed to sell your home without having this label. And, just like your car license, you will probably be required to get a new label every so often - maybe every year.
But, the government estimates the cost of measuring the energy efficiency of your home should only cost about $200 each time. Remember what they said about the auto smog inspections when they first started: that in California it would only cost $15. That was when the program started. Now the cost is about $50 for the inspection and certificate; a 333% increase. Expect the same from the home labeling program.
Sect. 304 Greater Energy Efficiency in Building Codes establishes new energy efficiency guidelines for the National Building Code and mandates at 304(d) that 1 year after enactment of this Act, all state and local jurisdictions must adopt the National Building Code energy efficiency provisions or must obtain a certification from the federal government that their state and/or local codes have been brought into full compliance with the National Building Code energy efficiency standards.
HELP US FIGHT THE EVIL EMPIRE IN WASHINGTON ! CALL - E-MAIL - WRITE - FIGHT - GO BALLISTIC IN THE EYES AND EARS OF CONGRESS!
The Senate is about to take action on this bill. The Copenhagen "Agenda 21" meeting will be in December 2009. Barack Obama had publically declared that he will sign the treaty produced at this meeting. This could be the last Merry Christmas we will be allowed to have, folks.
|
|
|
| Loading... | | |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #529 | This was very good. Forbes is no idiot and he has lots to say and you can hear him again tonight as they will be having an encore performance. Hope you can make it...
A Second Chance to Safeguard Your Wealth! Join Steve Forbes for the Emergency Dollar Summit! Special Encore Presentation: 7 p.m. Today (Eastern time) Attendance is Free: Register Here |
| Loading... | | |
crankyoldguy Registered: 02/23/07
Posts: 666
| |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
| |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #532 |
November 6, 2009 This came off of Glenn Beck's site. He surgery and how he did this I have no idea. Expected back at work on Tuesday. It was his appendix that were removed.... On Today’s ProgramObama's shocking post shooting insensitivity
As if blaming Bush for the floundering economy and the continuing effort to pile on to an already enormous deficit weren't evidence enough that Barack Obama isn't exactly presidential -- he poured more gasoline on to the fire with his remarks after the shooting at Fort Hood. He should have come out completely somber and measured in his remarks. Instead, he did THIS. |
|
| |
Ft. Hood shooter yelled 'Allahu Akbar'
“A US army psychiatrist about to be deployed to Afghanistan allegedly shouted ‘Allahu Akbar,’ or ‘God is greatest,’ as he opened fire at a military base in Texas, killing 13 people and wounding 28.”
Read the full story, including the heroic efforts by the civilian police officer who stopped the crazed gunman, Major Nidal Malik Hasan. Hasan, according to family and friends, was 'dreading' his coming deployment to Afghanistan. STORY
Obama Leaves Troops Hanging
Sting claims President Obama was sent from God to clean up the 'mess' around the world. What has the president done to clean up the 'mess' in Afghanistan? So far it has been more Professor Obama than President Obama, as he agonizes for weeks at a time before making a decision on helping our troops in harm’s way. In the latest Beck Talks video blog, Glenn shows all of the things Obama views as a 'crisis' that need urgent attention, and apparently our troops don't fit the bill. WATCH |
| | Unemployment Rate 10.2%
No matter how many times President Obama says he's created 'or saved' 1 million jobs, or Tim Geithner says the economy is great -- there's one truth difficult to ignore: unemployment keeps going up and is now at 10.2%. Despite the trillions of dollars government has dumped into trying to 'fix' the economy, our 'leader' responds with Hope and Blame (Bush) rather than the promised Hope and Change.
|
| |
| Loading... | | |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
| |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #534 | It was not a landslide so there is still great hope that this bill will not be passed in the Senate. I wish I had the names of all who voted for the bill to give you all, most likely it will be out tomorrow. Interested to see the Democrats who DID NOT vote for the bill...Glad that the Democrats cannot scream that they won by a landslide and it shows them how upset the country is about this bill to begin with. I think the last poll showed 65 or 85% of American's were happy with their current health care plan, sorry cannot find the poll at the moment. Why change it then? Cause Obama wants total control and once it is in play a few years there will be no other insurance companies as they will charge such low rates to initially join the Government Health Care Plan and many will be HAPPY but eventually the goal will be to knock out the competition and then everyone will be on socialized Health Care...Then we all will be screwed!
We still have time and this bill needs to be stopped. Shame on the AARP for endorsing this bill they just screwed their own customers...
|
| Loading... | | |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #535 | I personally cannot believe that this President would not go and admire what happened in Germany when they took down the wall in 89. What is his freaking deal? I suppose he would have enjoyed it staying up, just like he wants to do to us, CONTROL. Over my and many's dead bodies..
Obama Snubs Berlin Wall Ceremonies
President Barack Obama's decision to spurn German President Angela Merkel's invitation to attend ceremonies commemorating the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years ago is "the most telling nonevent of his presidency." That's the view of National Review Editor Rich Lowry, who notes that Obama has visited more foreign countries than any other president during his first year in office, yet has begged off going to Berlin to celebrate the Nov. 9 anniversary because of a crowded schedule. "It's hard to imagine any other American president eschewing the occasion," Lowry writes. "Wouldn't Obama at least want to take the occasion to celebrate freedom and human rights — those most cherished liberal values? Not necessarily. He has mostly jettisoned them as foreign-policy goals in favor of a misbegotten realism that soft-pedals the crimes of nasty regimes around the world. "During the Cold War, we undermined our enemies by shining a bright light on their repression," Lowry writes. "In Berlin, JFK called out the Communists on their 'offense against humanity.' Obama would utter such a phrase only with the greatest trepidation, lest it undermine a future opportunity for dialogue." The Berlin Wall came down because the free world, led by America, stood resolute against communist tyranny. But for Obama, "we are less an exceptional power than one among many, seeking deals with our peers in Beijing and Moscow," Lowry observes. "Why would Obama want to celebrate the refuseniks of the Eastern Bloc when he won't even meet with the Dalai Lama in advance of his trip to China?" |
| Loading... | | |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
|
|
| |
| #536 | FROM THE WASHINGTON POST DATED NOV 8TH, 2009. AFTER SEE WHAT DEOMCRAT DID NOT VOTE FOR THE BILL, PLEASE YOU HAVE TO GO TO READ RELATED ARTICLE: YOU WILL DIE LAUGHING..MY GOD! THEY NEED TO SWEEP THESE 3 COMMUNISTS OUT OF THE COUNTRY..FORGET THE WHITE HOUSE OR CONGRESS, AND THE WINNERS ARE O. BELLA AND REID...BY THE WAY THE DEMOCRATS FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE SOLD US OUT...
House Democrats Who Voted Against the Health Care BillLawmakers in the House voted 220 to 215 on Saturday night to approve a sweeping overhaul of the nation’s health care system. Only one Republican voted for the bill, and 39 Democrats opposed it, including 24 members of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition. An overwhelming majority of the Democratic lawmakers who opposed the bill — 31 of the 39 — represent districts that were won by Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, in the 2008 presidential election, and a third of them were freshmen. Nearly all of the fourteen freshmen Democrats who voted “no” represent districts that were previously Republican and are considered vulnerable in 2010. Geographically, 22 lawmakers from southern states formed the largest opposition bloc. Below are details on the Democrats that opposed the health care legislation in the House. |Related Article » | | Click the column headings below to view just the representatives in each category. Click here to show all | | Representative | Margin of victory when last elected | District’s winner in 2008 presidential election | Pct. of nonelderly uninsured in the district | Fresh- men | District won by McCain | District won by Obama | District switched from Repub- lican in 2008 | Blue Dogs |
|---|
| Scott Murphy(N.Y. 20) | <1 | | Obama | +3% | | 12% | | | | | | | | Bobby Bright(Ala. 2) | <1 | | McCain | +26% | | 15% | | | | | | | | Frank Kratovil Jr.(Md. 1) | <1 | | McCain | +19% | | 11% | | | | | | | | Walt Minnick(Idaho 1) | +1 | | McCain | +26% | | 20% | | | | | | | | Eric Massa(N.Y. 29) | +2 | | McCain | +3% | | 10% | | | | | | | | Parker Griffith(Ala. 5) | +3 | | McCain | +23% | | 16% | | | | | | | | John Adler(N.J. 3) | +4 | | Obama | +5% | | 11% | | | | | | | | Glenn Nye(Va. 2) | +5 | | Obama | +2% | | 12% | | | | | | | | Chet Edwards(Tex. 17) | +8 | | McCain | +35% | | 23% | | | | | | | | Travis Childers(Miss. 1) | +11 | | McCain | +24% | | 19% | | | | | | | | John Boccieri(Ohio 16) | +11 | | McCain | +2% | | 14% | | | | | | | | Larry Kissell(N.C. 8) | +11 | | Obama | +5% | | 20% | | | | | | | | Jason Altmire(Pa. 4) | +12 | | McCain | +11% | | 9% | | | | | | | | Harry Teague(N.M. 2) | +12 | | McCain | +1% | | 25% | | | | | | | | Betsy Markey(Colo. 4) | +12 | | McCain | +1% | | 18% | | | | | | | | Jim Marshall(Ga. 8) | +15 | | McCain | +13% | | 22% | | | | | | | | Suzanne Kosmas(Fla. 24) | +16 | | McCain | +2% | | 20% | | | | | | | | Dennis J. Kucinich(Ohio 10) | +18 | | Obama | +20% | | 13% | | | | | | | | Lincoln Davis(Tenn. 4) | +21 | | McCain | +29% | | 17% | | | | | | | | Allen Boyd(Fla. 2) | +24 | | McCain | +9% | | 18% | | | | | | | | Heath Shuler(N.C. 11) | +26 | | McCain | +5% | | 21% | | | | | | | | Tim Holden(Pa. 17) | +27 | | McCain | +3% | | 10% | | | | | | | | Michael E. McMahon(N.Y. 13) | +28 | | McCain | +2% | | 11% | | | | | | | | Brian Baird(Wash. 3) | +28 | | Obama | +8% | | 15% | | | | | | | | Jim Matheson(Utah 2) | +29 | | McCain | +18% | | 16% | | | | | | | | Ben Chandler(Ky. 6) | +29 | | McCain | +12% | | 16% | | | | | | | | Ike Skelton(Mo. 4) | +32 | | McCain | +22% | | 17% | | | | | | | | John Barrow(Ga. 12) | +32 | | Obama | +11% | | 21% | | | | | | | | Stephanie Herseth Sandlin(S.D.) | +35 | | McCain | +8% | | 14% | | | | | | | | Mike McIntyre(N.C. 7) | +38 | | McCain | +5% | | 23% | | | | | | | | Dan Boren(Okla. 2) | +41 | | McCain | +32% | | 29% | | | | | | | | Collin C. Peterson(Minn. 7) | +45 | | McCain | +3% | | 11% | | | | | | | | Bart Gordon(Tenn. 6) | +49 | | McCain | +25% | | 14% | | | | | | | | Gene Taylor(Miss. 4) | +49 | | McCain | +35% | | 22% | | | | | | | | Mike Ross(Ark. 4) | +72 | | McCain | +19% | | 22% | | | | | | | | Rick Boucher(Va. 9) | Unopposed | McCain | +19% | | 16% | | | | | | | | Artur Davis(Ala. 7) | Unopposed | Obama | +48% | | 19% | | | | | | | | Charlie Melancon(La. 3) | Unopposed | McCain | +24% | | 18% | | | | | | | | John Tanner(Tenn. 8) | Unopposed | McCain | +13% | | 16% | | |
|
| Loading... | | |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
| |
twit22 Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 1,767
| |
crankyoldguy Registered: 02/23/07
Posts: 666
|
|
| |
| #539 |
Constitutional Attorney's Response To HR3200 Michael Connelly Retired Attorney, Constitutional Law Instructor ================================================== ================
IF YOU HAVE DOUBTS AFTER THE PRESIDENT'S SPEECH , READ WHAT A CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER HAS TO SAY...
Michael Connelly of Carrollton, Texas is a retired Constitutional lawyer and has read the entire health care bill and has some comments, not about the bill, but about the effects on our Constitution. It's a broader picture than just health care reform.
It's time we sit up and pay attention; once this sort of thing happens, it will be irreversible. We have reason to be very afraid of what is happening.
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE HEALTH CARE BILLS
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.
The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled.
However, as scary as all of that it, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead, it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people and the businesses they own. The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with. I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.
This legislation also provides for access by the appointees of the Obama administration of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.
If you decide not to have healthcare insurance or if you have private insurance that is not deemed "acceptable" to the "Health Choices Administrator" appointed by Obama there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a "tax" instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the "due process of law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much out the original ten in the Bill of Rights that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn't stop there though. The 9th Amendment that provides: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.
I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation" to support the Constitution. If I was a member of Congress, I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat I suggest they consult the source. Here is a link to the Constitution: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html <http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript..html>
And another to the Bill of Rights: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html%C2%A0 |
| Loading... | | |
crankyoldguy Registered: 02/23/07
Posts: 666
| |